NAHT
Call us: 0300 30 30 333
Home Menu

JUAC comment on the PAC's 'concerns’ about the Government’s approach to asbestos management in schools

Asbestos management website.jpg

The Joint Union Asbestos Committee which comprises the education and support staff unions (ASCL, GMB, NAHT, NASUWT, NEU, UCU, UNISON, Unite and Voice) and the Asbestos in Schools Group, Chaired by Emma Hardy MP are today responding to the asbestos recommendations in the Public Accounts Committee report into Academy accounts and performance.

The Public Accounts Committee has yet again criticised the Government for failing to ensure that asbestos in the school estate is being properly managed.

Nearly 90% of schools contain asbestos – and much of this has been in place for decades. Exposure to asbestos fibres can lead to the development of mesothelioma, an incurable cancer, later in life.

At least 40 teachers and members of school staff died from mesothelioma in 2017 – an increase of over 30% from the year previous. Even more shocking is that 200-300 former pupils die annually as adults because they were exposed to asbestos when a pupil at school. These stark figures prove that the Government's policy of leaving asbestos 'in situ' has failed.

 The PAC report points to the ongoing Asbestos Management Assurance Process – the DfE's attempt to increase its limited knowledge about asbestos in the school estate. While responses have been received for 77% of schools (17,093), responsible bodies have only provided the necessary assurances that asbestos management is appropriate for just 53% (11,713) of schools, despite the deadline being pushed back on several occasions.

It is vital that employers and schools are open and transparent with staff and parents about the presence and management of asbestos in their school, and it is a legal requirement to do so.  The findings of the AMAP may go some way to improving transparency, but the unions remain concerned that there will be significant gaps in the data, which relied solely on self-reported information.

The DfE told the PAC that 'funding to deal with asbestos would be a top priority'. Despite this, there is no earmarked funding for asbestos removal and schools are being crippled by Government funding cuts. The Government should stop putting lives at risk and commit to the phased removal of all asbestos in schools, starting with the most dangerous first.

Emma Hardy MP, Chair of the Asbestos in Schools Group said:

'Nearly 90% of our schools still contain asbestos – and this is putting pupils and staff at risk of developing fatal illnesses in later life. The PAC has rightly criticised Government's inadequate approach to asbestos management.

What is needed is a Government funded phased removal of all asbestos in schools, starting with the most dangerous first. This is the only way to ensure the safety of school staff and most importantly pupils. As the Chair of the Asbestos in Schools group, I will be pressing the Government to commit the necessary funding for this'.

First published 23 January 2019