Home Menu

Structures, inspection and accountability

 
NAHT_Structures_Inspection.jpg

School leaders understand the need for public accountability. Parents, politicians and the wider public want to be sure that schools are doing their very best for the children they serve.

However, we also recognise that the current low-trust accountability system is based on a narrow range of measures that drive a range of perverse incentives and unintended consequences and that the current high-stakes inspection system all too often instils fear and stifles innovation. 

NAHT is committed to securing fairer methods and measures of accountability, so that pupils’ performance and school effectiveness are judged using a broad range of information, including the school's broader context and performance history, rather than a narrow focus on data.

Ensure published performance data are calculated and used fairly

  • Press the government to take action to ensure understanding across the sector of changes to primary progress data from 2020
  • Engage with the DfE to ensure that the reception baseline assessment is a valid baseline for progress 
  • Work with the DfE to ensure the methodology, publication and use of performance data is accurate, proportionate and appropriate.

 

Press for a transition from vertical high-stakes approach to accountability to a lateral system with greater ownership by the profession itself

  • Further develop, articulate and argue the case for a new approach to school accountability, building on NAHT's Commission, and working with other partners
  • Campaign against a hard accountability measure on exclusions
  • Make the case and lobby for a wholly independent complaints process for appeals against Ofsted inspection judgements
  • Lobby for the publication of all training materials for inspectors to ensure transparency and equity
  • Lobby Ofsted for greater transparency regarding the experience, skills and training of inspectors for specific phases and settings
  • Monitor members' experiences of the new inspection framework, holding Ofsted to account for the consistency, reliability and behaviour of inspectors, particularly around curriculum and the quality of education judgement.

 

Ensure any changes to school structures or systems benefit all pupils within a local community

  • Continue to oppose any form of forced academisation
  • Continue to oppose any expansion of grammar schools
  • Promote and advance local accountability, transparency and democracy in school structures and governance so that schools are best able to serve their wider local community
  • Make the case for centrally coordinated place planning to ensure all new school provision meets demand
  • Promote the full variety of school collaboration from Trusts to informal collaborations. 

Update on ongoing A level results situation: 16/8/20

The following message was sent to NAHT members from general secretary Paul Whiteman on 16/8/2020

The fiasco surrounding A-level results continues. NAHT has been careful with our public interventions. Increasingly the political Punch and Judy show has served to mitigate against finding the right solution. 

Just when we thought the situation could not get worse, further confusion and uncertainty has been created by the publishing and then withdrawal of Ofqual guidance on appeals. It is quite clear that the rules are being written and re-written on the hoof and the people that are suffering are the thousands of young people who have seen their future options narrow and disappear through no fault of their own.

Your feedback, along with the extensive media coverage we’ve seen shows that although there has been a rise in results overall there has been heartbreak for students whose results have been unfairly adjusted down. Although NAHT understood the desirability of a standardisation model in the exceptional circumstances this year, we consistently raised your concerns with Ofqual about the impact that too much weight being put onto the statistical data might have in causing disadvantage to centres and students. It is now clear the model has resulted in outcomes that are unjustifiable and unfair for some.

In this most challenging of years, the most important outcome for 2020 is that students get the results they deserve. The focus should be about finding solutions for those young people, not debating the rights and wrongs of a model to save political blushes. It is far too late for that.

The government has overseen the creation of a position where everyone will now be questioning the validity of their grades. System integrity has been lost.

School leaders and their teams did exactly what was asked of them in submitting centre assessed grades. No result should have been adjusted down by more than one grade. Anything other than that places undue weight on a statistical model over teacher professional judgement. Then a robust appeals system could have dealt with anomalies and unfairness.

This is still something which could happen if government and Ofqual automatically review those 25000 results which were 2 or more grades below the grades the centre submitted. This would immediately rectify the worst of the injustice and reduce the huge pressures which would be placed on schools and colleges to use the appeals system to do this. This would seem a sensible approach leaving the appeals system open to deal with fewer injustices faster.

The only other option available to government to deal with the situation is to rely solely on their student centre assessed grades. We can deal with the system impact in subsequent years.

The government needs to get a grip and take rapid and decisive action to restore confidence, fairness and stability both for young people that received their A-levels grades last week but also those receiving their GSCEs in the days to come.

There is no time to waste here, because A-level students need clarity immediately. And with GCSE results just days away many of the same issues will present themselves for year 11 students next Thursday if action is not taken.

We are making urgent representations to Government.

First published 16 August 2020
;